Discussion Papers and Other Documents
Date | From | Title | Summary | * |
Oct 1998 | P | A New Relationship | Proposing a new relationship with the Crown | A |
Nov 2014 | P | Notes on the Pimicikamak Constitution | Notes by former counsel based on observation and information from elders | D |
Dec 2015 | M/MH | Grant Funding | Reasons for rejecting grant funding | D |
Jan 2016 | P | Discussion Paper | Explaining how existing funding is genocidal and unacceptable | D |
Aug 2016 | P | National Trauma | Explaining why Manitoba Hydro is responsible for Pimicikamak national trauma | D |
Nov 2016 | P | Discussion Paper Protocol | Protocol for consulting Manitoba Hydro and making discussion papers public | A |
Feb 2017 | P | Treaty Medal Letter to Canada | Explaining why Pimicikamak is entitled to the medal not the band | S |
May 2017 | P | The Transparency Project | Explaining how the Pimicikamak government makes information open to its people | D |
Jun 2017 | P | How Grant Funding Works | Explaining grant funding from Manitoba Hydro | D |
Aug 2017 | P | The Financial Management Board | Explaining the roles of the Board and of the Secretary to the Board | D |
Nov 2017 | P | A Sustainable Relationship with Manitoba Hydro | Exploring consent as a basis for a sustainable relationship | D |
Mar 2018 | P | Grant Funding and the Problem of Consideration | Grant Funding and the problem of getting something of value in return | D |
*Status: A=adopted; D=draft; S=sent; discussion papers are usually shared in draft and may not ever be adopted.